The Chronic Myopia from Threes Brewing presents itself in a 16oz can, boasting a 6.9% ABV Citra & Mosaic IPA. Poured into a nonic pint glass, it reveals a hazy pale straw color with an impressive foam and commendable head retention. The visual appeal is undoubtedly enticing.


The initial olfactory experience is a delightful one. The beer emanates a captivating blend of lemonade, white peach, freshly-cut grass, and pineapple. However, as it warms up, the aromatic transition takes an unexpected turn, introducing grain notes like farmy wheat and oats, a departure from the typical hop-forward bouquet.


Chronic Myopia’s flavor profile challenges conventional expectations. Despite its 6.9% ABV, the IPA is remarkably light-bodied, presenting a nearly watery finish with prominent key lime flavors. The bitterness is subdued at 1/10, accompanied by a modest sweetness at 3/10. This peculiar combination blurs the lines between substyles, leaning towards a hazy IPA with potential oat or wheat inclusions, yet devoid of the usual sugar content.


The mouthfeel is an interesting aspect of Chronic Myopia. Unusually dry for an IPA, it flirts with the characteristics of a session IPA, defying the perception of its ABV. The lack of body and sugar makes it refreshing and sessionable, deviating from the creamy, milkshake-like texture associated with neighboring breweries.


Chronic Myopia emerges as a distinctive outlier in the IPA realm, offering an experience that challenges preconceived notions. Its minimal bitterness and body make it refreshing and sessionable, but it might disappoint those anticipating a traditional hazy IPA. Threes Brewing has managed to craft a beer that straddles the line between a farmhouse ale and a hoppy creation, creating a unique blend that stands out in a saturated market.

Taking a moment to reflect on the broader context of beer reviews, it’s crucial to recognize the delicate balance between constructive criticism and emotional expression. In the world of beer reviewing, the value lies in detailed assessments that provide insight for both consumers and breweries.

Over the years, having reviewed thousands of beers and businesses, the emphasis on critical reviews becomes evident. Businesses often respond to constructive feedback positively, using it as a tool for improvement. It’s a symbiotic relationship where the consumer’s discerning evaluation contributes to the refinement of the product.

However, there’s a constant struggle to maintain authenticity in critical reviews. While it’s essential to be diplomatic, sugar-coating risks rendering the review disingenuous. Striking this balance is an ongoing challenge, considering the dual audience of producers and consumers, each with distinct perspectives and goals.

Consumers rely on reviews to make informed decisions, and producers should view critical feedback not as a hindrance but as invaluable quality control. In the era of instant feedback, online reviews play a pivotal role in a business’s success. Producers should embrace constructive criticism as an opportunity for growth rather than dismissing it based on current sales figures.

As a reviewer, acknowledging personal preferences and potential biases adds transparency to the evaluation process. Beer quality can be subjective and influenced by various factors, making it essential for both reviewers and readers to approach critiques with an understanding of individual tastes and the inherent variability in beer production.

In essence, the critical review serves as a valuable tool for the industry’s continuous improvement, fostering a culture of transparency, accountability, and ultimately, delivering better products to consumers.