Upon pouring Boomtown’s Medusa Double Hazy IPA, the initial visual impression is not awe-inspiring. The murky, dark gold liquid, with a hint of brownish tinge, lacks the vibrant appeal seen in some competitors’ offerings. Head retention is disappointingly brief, fading away rapidly, and the overall presentation falls short of the more enticing visuals found in certain rival brews like Belching Beaver’s Digital Bath.


The olfactory experience of Medusa is dominated by a combination of whipped cream and pineapple sundae. While these scents are undeniably present and persistent, they monopolize the aroma, leaving little room for nuance or complexity. It lacks the layered and intriguing notes that elevate some of the top-tier hazy IPAs in the market.


Moving on to the taste, Medusa presents a commendable but not groundbreaking profile. The soft and creamy mouthfeel, coupled with a medium level of sweetness, is complemented by assertive oat and wheat elements, resulting in a denser, heavier-bodied beer. The overripe yellow fruit flavors, accented by hints of vanilla and fluffy cake, take center stage. However, the promise of a tropical smoothie is slightly undermined by a subtle acidity that emerges in the aftertaste.


Medusa’s mouthfeel is undoubtedly a strong point, with its soft and creamy texture contributing to an enjoyable drinking experience. The density and heavier body, while well-executed, might not align with the preferences of those seeking a lighter, more refreshing hazy IPA. The beer successfully conceals the alcohol content, a positive aspect that prevents it from overpowering the overall flavor profile.


In the saturated landscape of hazy IPAs, Boomtown’s Medusa holds its own but falls short of being a standout. While its flawless execution avoids common pitfalls like gritty or chalky flavors, it lacks the finesse and depth found in offerings from renowned producers like Monkish and Modern Times. The pineapple banana smoothie flavor, while commendable, doesn’t push Medusa into the upper echelons of the hazy IPA world. It resonates as a solid entry, but not one that elevates Boomtown Brewery to the upper tier of Southern California’s hazy IPA producers.

The Critical Reviewer’s Perspective

Reflecting on the broader context of beer reviews, it’s essential to acknowledge the dual purpose they serve – guiding consumers and providing constructive feedback to businesses. While positive reviews are pleasant, it is the critical ones that draw attention and scrutiny. A well-constructed critical review is not a detriment but rather an opportunity for businesses to engage in quality control. It is crucial for producers to view critical feedback as a pathway to improvement rather than as a hindrance to sales.

Final Thoughts

In the ever-connected world of online reviews, the relationship between producers and consumers has become symbiotic. Producers, rather than dismissing critical feedback, should embrace it as a tool for growth. Consumers, in turn, should approach reviews with respect for differing opinions and an understanding of the multifaceted factors influencing individual experiences with a particular beer. As we navigate this intricate landscape of reviews, let’s foster a culture that appreciates honesty and open dialogue, benefitting both producers and consumers alike. Cheers to the pursuit of quality and the diversity of palate preferences in the world of craft beer.